The pattern is familiar:
Smartsheet landed in a few teams, spreads organically, and suddenly leadership is accountable for portfolio decisions with no platform capable of supporting them.
You can't scale it; you can't roll it across the organization consistently, and you have no visibility at the top. And now, with Smartsheet's evolving pricing and licensing models, organizations are forced to re-evaluate the value received. If you're already facing a packaging review, reassessing seat types, premium tiers, and who needs what type of access, then why not evaluate whether the platform itself can scale beyond a single department?
Join us on Thursday, April 16, 11am CT, where we'll cover:
- Why the buying criteria change as PMOs mature: The strengths that made Smartsheet adequate early on are not the capabilities you need now. Growing PMOs require funding and capacity tradeoffs, scenario planning, dependency governance, and outcome tracking
- Smartsheet's critical gaps: Smartsheet lacks meaningful resource management and capacity planning at scale. Unlike Smartsheet, Planview is purpose-built for demand management, prioritization, and resource management.
- The packaging, pricing, and scaling wall: Smartsheet's pricing changes mean you're likely already rethinking your investment. Scaling portfolios consistently demands higher-tier packaging that still doesn't close the strategic planning gap
- See Planview in action: From Demand Intake to Prioritization to Capacity Planning to Scenario Planning and Governance. We’ll show you the end-to-end portfolio management workflow that Smartsheet simply cannot deliver
When your PMO is accountable for prioritizing investments, balancing scarce capacity, and governing portfolios with confidence, it's time to evaluate a platform purpose-built for portfolio decisions under constraints. Why not? You're already being asked to reassess what you're paying for.
The pattern is familiar:
Smartsheet landed in a few teams, spreads organically, and suddenly leadership is accountable for portfolio decisions with no platform capable of supporting them.
You can't scale it; you can't roll it across the organization consistently, and you have no visibility at the top. And now, with Smartsheet's evolving pricing and licensing models, organizations are forced to re-evaluate the value received. If you're already facing a packaging review, reassessing seat types, premium tiers, and who needs what type of access, then why not evaluate whether the platform itself can scale beyond a single department?
Join us on Thursday, April 16, 11am CT, where we'll cover:
- Why the buying criteria change as PMOs mature: The strengths that made Smartsheet adequate early on are not the capabilities you need now. Growing PMOs require funding and capacity tradeoffs, scenario planning, dependency governance, and outcome tracking
- Smartsheet's critical gaps: Smartsheet lacks meaningful resource management and capacity planning at scale. Unlike Smartsheet, Planview is purpose-built for demand management, prioritization, and resource management.
- The packaging, pricing, and scaling wall: Smartsheet's pricing changes mean you're likely already rethinking your investment. Scaling portfolios consistently demands higher-tier packaging that still doesn't close the strategic planning gap
- See Planview in action: From Demand Intake to Prioritization to Capacity Planning to Scenario Planning and Governance. We’ll show you the end-to-end portfolio management workflow that Smartsheet simply cannot deliver
When your PMO is accountable for prioritizing investments, balancing scarce capacity, and governing portfolios with confidence, it's time to evaluate a platform purpose-built for portfolio decisions under constraints. Why not? You're already being asked to reassess what you're paying for.
AJ ShavellDirector of Solution Consulting, PlanviewAJ Shavell is a Director of Solution Consulting at Planview, where he collaborates with customers to help them optimize their current strategy, solutions, and processes to drive successful business outcomes. AJ is an experienced technology consultant with 10+ years of expertise in Work Management, Strategy Planning, and Technology Consulting.